The Problem on Recruiters’ Desks
In today’s European job market, demand for talent is soaring, but so is the mismatch between posted requirements and candidate reality. Many recruiters face pushback when crafting job descriptions stuffed with overly specific demands: multiple “must-have” degrees, experience levels that don’t align with junior roles, or contradictory responsibilities that no single candidate can feasibly fill. These unrealistic job listings not only delay hiring, they also repel strong, viable candidates and contribute to turnover when hires can’t meet unstated expectations.
“You Don’t Need a Unicorn”
“Sometimes these job descriptions are looking for a unicorn.”
She emphasized that companies are increasingly realizing the value of investing in current teams’ skills, in effect, creating their own unicorns, rather than chasing mythical perfect hires.
How Unrealistic Job Descriptions Undermine Hiring Fit
| Issue | Impact |
|---|---|
| Inflated Requirements (e.g., unnecessary degrees or years of experience) | Shrinks candidate pool and reinforces misplaced screening |
| Contradictory Skill Lists | Confuses applicants or discourages them from applying |
| Vague Job Descriptions | Leads to misaligned expectations and wasted time for both recruiters and candidates |
| Overpromising Role | Damages employer brand when the job reality doesn’t match the posting |
Recruiter Challenges: What's Driving Unrealism?
- Wish-List Mentality
Hiring managers often compile an exhaustive wishlist, looking for the “perfect candidate” with every skill imaginable. This puts recruiters in a tough spot: trying to fill roles quickly, while managers hold out for unattainable criteria.
- Easy Screening Shortcuts
Rigid qualifications like “master’s degree required” serve as blunt tools to thin applicant volumes, but they may exclude great candidates who could excel with training and opportunity.
- Legacy Descriptions & Internal Misalignment
Job descriptions are often updated by tacking on new requirements rather than rethinking the core role, resulting in bloated lists that don’t match the actual work or the candidate market.
A Better Way: Realistic, Skills-Based Hiring
For Recruiters and Employers:
- Prioritize “Must-Have” over “Nice-to-Have”
- Use Specific, Transparent Language: Instead of saying “dynamic self-starter,” describe actual responsibilities. Clarity builds trust and improves fit.
- Be Honest About Growth and Support: Frame the role with what the company offers, not just what it demands. Mention training opportunities, mentorship, or career pathways to attract motivated candidates.
- Test Requirements Against the Market: Analyze whether the criteria are realistic for the offered salary and level. If few professionals fit, consider adjusting requirements or budget expectations.
- Embrace Skills, Not Credentials: Where possible, de-emphasize degrees and emphasize demonstrated skills, especially in fast-evolving fields. This opens the door to non-traditional talent and boosts diversity.
.
Final Thoughts
Europe’s skills gap isn’t solely a training or education issue, it's also shaped by how employers define roles. Overloaded, unclear, or inflated job descriptions create barriers for recruiters and discourage real talent from applying. As Nicole Sims suggests, building internal capabilities may be a smarter, more sustainable path than chasing the perfect external hire.
Let’s shift the narrative: stop posting for unicorns, and start hiring for real. When job descriptions are grounded, clear, and skills-based, recruiters fill roles faster, candidates thrive, and organizations start to bridge the skills gap with strategies, not myths.
Want to dive deeper into the challenges candidates and recruiters face?
Read our other blogs on what job seekers struggle with, and explore tips for candidates navigating today’s hiring market.